Artificial Neural Networks for Performance Prediction of Biomass Gasification: A Tool for Sustainable Energy Prediction

Authors

  • Mohamed Baqar Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya
  • Boshra Haraga Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya
  • Mafaz Alswihly Artificial Neural Networks for Performance Prediction of Biomass Gasification: A Tool for Sustainable Energy Prediction
  • Hayat Fanan Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya

Keywords:

Biomass Gasification, Artificial Neural Network, Sustainable Energy, Renewable Energy

Abstract

Biomass gasification is one of the essential thermochemical processes for the production of clean syngas, which is consistent with the global energy agenda towards the development of renewable energy resources. Yet, the prediction of the operating parameters of the biomass gasification system is still challenging due to the nonlinear nature of the system dynamics. The development of an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model for predicting the composition of syngas produced in bubbling fluidized bed gasifiers using 321 datasets available in literature is presented. Two models, namely Feed Forward Back Propagation (FFBP) and Cascade Forward Back Propagation (CFBP), are used in this study. The FFBP network with two hidden layers was found to be the best ANN model with coefficients of determinations R² > 0.97 and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) between 7 and 12 percent for CO, H₂, CO₂, CH₄, and gas yield. The best ANN model is the FFBP network architecture with two hidden layers trained through One-Hot Encoding. The ANN model obtains R² > 0.85 and MAPE < 18% for CO₂, H₂, CO, and gas yield in all types of bed materials. A systematic approach for selecting the optimal topology of the network through the 5-fold cross-validation procedure was used. Through sensitivity analysis using the permutation method, it was found that the key parameters affecting syngas quality were the ash content (average 24.5%) and carbon content (average 14.7%), and unexpectedly, the temperature and steam/biomass ratio had minor effects. This study can contribute to the sustainable development agenda by improving the energy efficiency and reducing the cost of experimentation towards the achievement of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 7 and 9. The ANN-based model can be considered as a computationally efficient tool for the prediction of the biomass gasification system towards the development of the green economy

References

Chan, Y. H., Rahman, S. N. F. S. A., Lahuri, H. M., & Khalid, A. (2021). Recent progress on CO-rich syngas production via CO2 gasification of various wastes: A critical review on efficiency, challenges and outlook. Environmental Pollution, 278, Article 116843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116843.

Klass, D. L. (1998). Biomass for renewable energy, fuels, and chemicals. Elsevier.

Bahadar, A., Kanthasamy, R., Sait, H. H., Zwawi, M., Algarni, M., Ayodele, B. V., Cheng, C. K., & Wei, L. J. (2022). Elucidating the effect of process parameters on the production of hydrogen-rich syngas by biomass and coal Co-gasification techniques: A multi-criteria modeling approach. Chemosphere, 287(Part 1), Article 132052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132052.

Singh, D. K., & Tirkey, J. V. (2021). Modeling and multi-objective optimization of variable air gasification performance parameters using Syzygium cumini biomass by integrating ASPEN Plus with Response surface methodology (RSM). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(36), 18816-18831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.045.

Khanmohammadi, S., Atashkari, K., & Kouhikamali, R. (2016). Modeling and assessment of a biomass gasification integrated system for multigeneration purpose. International Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2016(1), Article 2639241. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2639241.

Almeida, J. S. (2002). Predictive non-linear modeling of complex data by artificial neural networks. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 13(1), 72-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00288-4.

Baqar, M., Alzeyani, R., Zraig, M., & Madi, R. (2025). A comparative study of neural network algorithms for modelling hydrogen sulphide removal from natural gas. Journal of Technology Research. 770-779. https://doi.org/10.26629/jtr.2025.72.

Sunphorka, S., Chalermsinsuwan, B., & Piumsomboon, P. (2017). Artificial neural network model for the prediction of kinetic parameters of biomass pyrolysis from its constituents. Fuel, 193, 142-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.12.064.

Katsaros, G., Pandey, D. S., Horvat, A., Almansa, G. A., Fryda, L. E., Leahy, J. J., & Tassou, S. A. (2020). Experimental investigation of poultry litter gasification and co-gasification with beech wood in a bubbling fluidised bed reactor–Effect of equivalence ratio on process performance and tar evolution. Fuel, 262, Article 116660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116660.

Gómez-Barea, A., Arjona, R., & Ollero, P. (2005). Pilot-plant gasification of olive stone: A technical assessment. Energy & Fuels, 19(2), 598-605. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef049837z.

Wang, S., Wu, F., & Wang, X. (2023). Experimental and kinetics analysis on biomass chemical looping gasification using lean iron ore as oxygen carrier. Chemical Engineering Journal, 474, Article 145855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.145855.

Porcu, A., Xu, Y., Mureddu, M., Dessì, F., Shahnam, M., Rogers, W. A., Sastri, B. S., & Pettinau, A. (2021). Experimental validation of a multiphase flow model of a lab-scale fluidized-bed gasification unit. Applied Energy, 293, Article 116933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116933.

Narnaware, S. L., Panwar, N. L., Gupta, T., & Meena, K. K. (2023). Bubbling fluidized bed gasification of biomass: A review on the effect of selected operational parameters. Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC135.449.

Van Huynh, C., & Kong, S.-C. (2013). Performance characteristics of a pilot-scale biomass gasifier using oxygen-enriched air and steam. Fuel, 103, 987-996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.09.033.

Lv, P., Xiong, Z., Chang, J., Wu, C., Chen, Y., & Zhu, J. (2004). An experimental study on biomass air–steam gasification in a fluidized bed. Bioresource Technology, 95(1), 95-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.003.

Arena, U., Zaccariello, L., & Mastellone, M. L. (2010). Fluidized bed gasification of waste-derived fuels. Waste Management, 30(7), 1212-1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.038.

Miccio, F., Piriou, B., Ruoppolo, G., & Chirone, R. (2009). Biomass gasification in a catalytic fluidized reactor with beds of different materials. Chemical Engineering Journal, 154(1-3), 369-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.04.023.

Baratieri, M., Pieratti, E., Nordgreen, T., & Grigiante, M. (2010). Biomass gasification with dolomite as catalyst in a small fluidized bed experimental and modelling analysis. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 1(3), 283-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-010-9039-4.

Loha, C., Chattopadhyay, H., & Chatterjee, P. K. (2013). Energy generation from fluidized bed gasification of rice husk. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 5(4), Article 043111. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4816499.

Timsina, R., Thapa, R. K., Moldestad, B. M. E., Jaiswal, R., Bhattarai, A., Jecmenica, M., & Eikeland, M. S. (2023). Experimental evaluation of wood and grass pellets in a bubbling fluidized bed gasifier. Energy Reports, 9, 4049-4058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.03.051.

Awais, M., Li, W., Munir, A., Omar, M. M., & Ajmal, M. (2021). Experimental investigation of downdraft biomass gasifier fed by sugarcane bagasse and coconut shells. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 11(2), 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00692-5.

Pandey, D. S., Kwapinska, M., Gómez-Barea, A., Horvat, A., Fryda, L. E., Rabou, L. P., Leahy, J. J., & Kwapinski, W. (2016). Poultry litter gasification in a fluidized bed reactor: Effects of gasifying agent and limestone addition. Energy & Fuels, 30(4), 3085-3096. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02459.

Guerrero, J., Carmona-Martínez, A., & Jarauta-Córdoba, C. (2024). Renewable syngas production and technoeconomic validation in a pilot-scale reactor of air and air-steam gasification of biomass. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 93, 273-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.341.

Nagy, G., & Dobó, Z. (2020). Experimental investigation of fixed-bed pyrolysis and steam gasification of food waste blended with woody biomass. Biomass and Bioenergy, 139, Article 105580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105580.

Fan, H., Ke, H., Zhou, D., Jia, C., Luo, Z., Yang, H., Zhang, H., Yang, H., Chen, H., & Zhang, S. (2024). Experimental and simulation study on coal-fired power generation coupling with fluidized bed biomass gasification. Journal of the Energy Institute, 117, Article 101732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2024.101732

Ascher, S., Sloan, W., Watson, I., & You, S. (2022). A comprehensive artificial neural network model for gasification process prediction. Applied Energy, 320, Article 119289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119289.

Chang, P. Y., Chan, Y. J., Arumugasamy, S. K., Wan, Y. K., & Lim, J. W. (2025). Optimisation of anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent with biochar addition: Synergistic application of Artificial neural network and response Surface Methodology. Fuel, 398, Article 135514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.135514.

Njuguna, F. I., Ndiritu, H. M., Gathitu, B. B., Hawi, M., & Munyalo, J. M. (2023). Experimental investigation and optimization of the gasification parameters of macadamia nutshells in a batch-fed bubbling fluidized bed gasifier with air preheating. Energy Storage and Saving, 2(4), 559-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enss.2023.08.001.

Kumar, A. (2024). Experimental analysis of dual-stage ignition biomass downdraft gasifier based on various gasification media for the generation of high-quality producer gas. Fuel, 361, Article 130708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130708.

Freda, C., Catizzone, E., Villone, A., & Cornacchia, G. (2024). Biomass gasification in rotary kiln integrated with a producer gas thermal cleaning unit: An experimental investigation. Results in Engineering, 21, Article 101763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101763.

Bai, Y., Wang, Y., Zou, L., Xiu, H., Liu, T., & Zhang, X. (2024). Experimental study on hydrogen production from heavy tar in biomass gasification furnace catalyzed by carbon-based catalysts. Fuel, 361, Article 130718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130718.

Arena, U., & Di Gregorio, F. (2014). Gasification of a solid recovered fuel in a pilot scale fluidized bed reactor. Fuel, 117(Part A), 528-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.09.059.

Serrano, D., Sánchez-Delgado, S., & Horvat, A. (2017). Effect of sepiolite bed material on gas composition and tar mitigation during C. cardunculus L. gasification. Chemical Engineering Journal, 317, 1037-1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.02.125.

Serrano, D., Kwapinska, M., Horvat, A., Sánchez-Delgado, S., & Leahy, J. J. (2016). Cynara cardunculus L. gasification in a bubbling fluidized bed: The effect of magnesite and olivine on product gas, tar and gasification performance. Fuel, 173, 247-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.01.051.

Mansaray, K. G., Ghaly, A., Al-Taweel, A., Hamdullahpur, F., & Ugursal, V. (1999). Air gasification of rice husk in a dual distributor type fluidized bed gasifier. Biomass and Bioenergy, 17(4), 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00046-2.

Kaewluan, S., & Pipatmanomai, S. (2011). Potential of synthesis gas production from rubber wood chip gasification in a bubbling fluidised bed gasifier. Energy Conversion and Management, 52(1), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.06.043.

Kaewluan, S., & Pipatmanomai, S. (2011). Gasification of high moisture rubber woodchip with rubber waste in a bubbling fluidized bed. Fuel Processing Technology, 92(3), 671-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.11.026.

Lahijani, P., & Zainal, Z. A. (2011). Gasification of palm empty fruit bunch in a bubbling fluidized bed: A performance and agglomeration study. Bioresource Technology, 102(2), 2068-2076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.101.

Lan, W., Chen, G., Zhu, X., Wang, X., Wang, X., & Xu, B. (2019). Research on the characteristics of biomass gasification in a fluidized bed. Journal of the Energy Institute, 92(3), 613-620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2018.03.011.

Han, S. W., Lee, J. J., Tokmurzin, D., Lee, S. H., Nam, J. Y., Park, S. J., Ra, H. W., Mun, T.-Y., Yoon, S. J., Yoon, S. M., Moon, J. H., Lee, J. G., Kim, Y.-M., Rhee, Y. W., & Seo, M. W. (2022). Gasification characteristics of waste plastics (SRF) in a bubbling fluidized bed: Effects of temperature and equivalence ratio. Energy, 238(Part B), Article 121944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121944.

Timofeeva, S. S., Karaeva, J. V., Kovalev, A. A., Kovalev, D. A., & Litti, Y. V. (2023). Steam gasification of digestate after anaerobic digestion and dark fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass to produce syngas with high hydrogen content. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(21), 7559-7568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.100.

Tang, F., Chi, Y., Jin, Y., Zhu, Z., & Ma, J. (2022). Gasification characteristics of a simulated waste under separate and mixed atmospheres of steam and CO2. Fuel, 317, Article 123527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123527.

Flori, G., Frigo, S., Barontini, F., Gabbrielli, R., & Sica, P. (2024). Experimental assessment of oxy-CO2 gasification strategy with woody biomass. Renewable Energy, 228, Article 120593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120593.

Babatabar, M. A., & Saidi, M. (2021). Hydrogen production via integrated configuration of steam gasification process of biomass and water-gas shift reaction: Process simulation and optimization. International Journal of Energy Research, 45(13), 19378-19394. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.7061.

Porcu, A., Sollai, S., Marotto, D., Mureddu, M., Ferrara, F., & Pettinau, A. (2019). Techno-economic analysis of a small-scale biomass-to-energy BFB gasification-based system. Energies, 12(3), Article 494. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12030494.

Li, G., Liu, Z., Liu, T., Shan, J., Fang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2018). Techno-economic analysis of a coal to hydrogen process based on ash agglomerating fluidized bed gasification. Energy Conversion and Management, 164, 552-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.03.029.

Potdar, K., Pardawala, T. S., & Pai, C. D. (2017). A comparative study of categorical variable encoding techniques for neural network classifiers. International Journal of Computer Applications, 175(4), 7-9. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2017915495.

Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.

Sheela, K. G., & Deepa, S. N. (2013). Review on methods to fix number of hidden neurons in neural networks. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, Article 425740. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/425740.

Downloads

Published

22-05-2026

How to Cite

Baqar, M. ., Haraga, B. ., Alswihly, M. ., & Fanan , H. . (2026). Artificial Neural Networks for Performance Prediction of Biomass Gasification: A Tool for Sustainable Energy Prediction . Sahel Almarifah Journal for Humanities and Applied Sciences, 2, E–303 . Retrieved from https://ojs.academy.edu.ly/index.php/JKCHAS/article/view/640

Issue

Section

Articles